class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # What is Open Science and Why Should the NEPs Care? ### <a href="mailto:marcusb@sccwrp.org">Dr. Marcus Beck</a> <span class="math inline">•</span> <a href="https://twitter.com/fawda123">@fawda123</a> <span class="math inline">•</span> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TampaBayOpenSci?src=hashtag_click">#TampaBayOpensci</a> ### Tampa Bay Estuary Program ### 10/29/2020 --- class: middle, center, inverse # The scientific process --- class: middle, center <img src="figure/scipro.png" width="90%" /> --- class: middle, center <img src="figure/appscipro.png" width="90%" /> --- class: middle, center, inverse # Scientist: "My 500 page report will answer all their questions!" --- class: middle, center, inverse # Manager: "This 500 page report does not answer any of my questions!" --- class: middle, center, inverse # Sometimes applied science is really implied science --- class: middle, center ## The research-management divide <img src="figure/divide.png" width="100%" /> --- class: middle, center ## The research-management divide <img src="figure/divide2.png" width="100%" /> --- class: middle, center <img src="figure/michener.png" width="90%" /> .footnote[Michener et al. 1997 Ecol. App. 7(1):330-342.] --- class: middle, center ## Open sience can bridge this divide <img src="figure/bridge.png" width="100%" /> --- class: middle, center, inverse # Key definitions and concepts --- class: middle, center ### The practice of science in such a way that others can **collaborate** and **contribute**, where research data, lab notes and other research processes are **freely available**, under terms that enable **reuse**, **redistribution** and **reproduction** of the research and its underlying data and methods .footenote[Open Knowledge International, [http://opendefinition.org/](http://opendefinition.org/), [https://creativecommons.org/](https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/open-science/)] ### Data are __F__indable, __A__ccessible, __I__nteroperable, and __R__esuable .footnote[[Wilkinson et al. 2016 Nature 3:160018](https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18)] --- class: middle, center <img src="figure/fiveschools.PNG" width="90%" /> .footnote[[Fecher and Friesike 2014. Opening Science, Springer.](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2)] --- class: middle, center # The open science workflow <img src="figure/basicflow.png" width="90%" /> .footnote[Figure reproduced and modified with permission from M. McManus, USEPA ORD] --- class: middle, center # The open science workflow <img src="figure/open.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .footnote[[Beck et al. 2020. PeerJ 8:e9539.](https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9539)] --- class: middle, center # CCMP reporting: The old way <img src="figure/badflow2.png" width="100%" /> --- class: middle, center # CCMP reporting: The new way <img src="figure/openflow.png" width="100%" /> --- class: middle, center, inverse # Open science is a process and a philosophy that can super-charge your program to "create better science in less time", together .footnote[[Lowndes et al. 2017. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1:0160.](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0160)]