These plots show model predicted chlorophyll as a function of time, season, and salinity using a WRTDS approach described here. The results provide an estimate of chlorophyll trends at different conditional percentiles of the response, in this case, the median and 90th percentile (tau = 0.5, 0.9). A “flow-normalized” trend independent of salinity is also provided. The top plot shows predicted chlorophyll (lines) for the different percentiles overlaid on the observed values (points). The middle plot shows flow-normalized chlorophyll (lines) against the predictions (points). Importantly, predictions for 2021 show little difference between the flow-normalized and predicted results, suggesting little influence of freshwater inputs into the system. The bottom two plots show the flow-normalized results by day of year, with separate lines by year. Note the uptick in 2021 flow-normalized predictions (thicker line) of chlorophyll for some stations.
These plots show model-predicted chlorophyll (as a function of time) using a GAMs approach described here. The basic idea is to model a signal of a long-term seasonal and annual trend from an observed time series and then extract a seasonal metric of interest from the modelled signal. The seasonal metric applies to an a priori window of time (e.g., March, April, etc.) and includes statistical uncertainty that can be used for additional hypothesis testing. The results do not include any flow-adjusted or hydrologic inputs.
These plots show median plus 5th/95th percentiles of observed chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus for all stations in the immediate vicinity of Piney Point (Area 1 here). Observations for 2021 are shown in red, whereas “baseline” observations are shown in black. Baseline includes data for all long-term monitoring stations in Area 1 from 2006 to present.